AC40903 - Echeverria v. Commissioner of Correction- (The petitioner’s sole claim on appeal is that the habeas
court improperly rejected his claim that he had received ineffective assistance
of counsel due to his attorney’s failure to advise him properly of the immigration
consequences of his guilty plea pursuant to Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356,
130 S. Ct. 1473, 176 L. Ed. 2d 284 (2010). We disagree and, accordingly, affirm
the judgment of the habeas court.)
AC40904 - King v. Commissioner of Correction
("On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly
(1) concluded that the petitioner failed to establish that he had received
ineffective assistance from his trial counsel, and (2) dismissed the petitioner’s
claims that his right to due process was violated by the trial court’s not stating
on the record its refusal to accept the petitioner’s pretrial plea agreement. We
affirm the judgment of the habeas court.")