SC20794 - State v. Haynes (“On appeal, the defendant makes three claims. First, the
defendant asks us to overrule State v.Reid, 193 Conn. 646, 654–55 and
n.11, 480 A.2d 463 (1984), which held that the Connecticut constitution permits
the state to impeach a criminal defendant with a voluntary statement obtained
in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L.
Ed. 2d 694 (1966). Second, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in
admitting photographs taken of him during an interview that violated his right
to counsel under Miranda. Third, the defendant claims that he was
deprived of a fair trial when the prosecutor presented testimony from a witness
who had been disclosed only three days prior to the start of evidence. We
disagree with each of the defendant’s claims and affirm the judgment of
conviction.”)