SC20792 - State v. Marcello E. (“On appeal, the defendant asks us to reject the Appellate
Court’s conclusion that the prior misconduct evidence was admissible and
instead to conclude that it was not relevant to a material fact in the case,
and, even if it were relevant, that its probative value did not outweigh its
prejudicial effect. We agree with the defendant to the extent that the evidence
was unduly prejudicial and harmful and therefore reverse the judgment of the
Appellate Court and order a remand of the case for a new trial.”)