AC45569 - Grant v. Commissioner of Correction (“On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court
improperly (1) concluded that the eyewitness identification evidence presented
at his criminal trial did not violate his due process rights; (2) concluded
that he had not established that his trial counsel was ineffective for having
failed to consult with or offer the testimony of an eyewitness identification
expert, for having failed to investigate the issue of phone calls the
petitioner allegedly made from a witness’ cell phone immediately prior to the
crime, and for having failed to investigate and to present potential alibi
witness testimony; and (3) declined to credit the testimony of two expert
witnesses at the habeas trial. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.”)