AC45529 - Reyes v. State (“On appeal, the petitioner claims that the trial court (1)
abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal, (2)
improperly determined that his newly discovered third-party culpability
evidence would probably not produce a different result in a new trial, and (3)
improperly determined that the state did not suppress his newly discovered
impeachment evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S.
Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963). We disagree and, therefore, dismiss the
appeal.”)
AC45634 -
Reyes v. State (“On appeal, the petitioner claims that the trial court
improperly (1) concluded, as a matter of law, that the three year limitation
period of § 52-582 cannot be tolled by application of the fraudulent
concealment statute, General Statutes § 52-595,2 and (2) determined that the
exception to the three year limitation period for newly discovered forensic
scientific evidence pursuant to § 52-582 (a) was not applicable to the present
case. We agree with the petitioner’s first claim but disagree with his second
claim. Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the
trial court, and we remand the case to the trial court for a new evidentiary
hearing before a different judge to determine whether the three year limitation
period of § 52-582 was tolled by § 52-595.”)