AC44757 - Gervais v. JACC Healthcare Center of Danielson, LLC ("This appeal returns to us on remand from our Supreme Court. Gervais v. JACC Healthcare Center of Danielson, LLC, 346 Conn. 910, 289 A.3d 596 (2023).The plaintiffs, Tammy Gervais and Cassandra Gervais, appealed to this court from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion to dismiss filed by the defendants, JACC Healthcare Center of Danielson, LLC (JACC), and Beth Davis. The trial court, in its order dismissing the plaintiffs' medical malpractice action, concluded that (1) the opinion letter attached to the plaintiffs' complaint was deficient pursuant to Connecticut's good faith opinion letter statute, General Statutes § 52-190a, because it failed to sufficiently identify the author's qualifications, thereby depriving the court of the ability to determine whether the author was a "similar health care provider," as defined by General Statutes § 52-184c; and (2) it lacked the authority to grant the plaintiffs' request to amend the complaint, filed in response to the defendants' motion to dismiss, that sought to include two new attachments to the opinion letter elucidating the qualifications of the author. This court, by memorandum decision, affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Gervais v. JACC Center of Danielson, LLC, 212 Conn. App. 902, 273 A.3d 749 (2022).Thereafter, the plaintiffs petitioned our Supreme Court for certification to appeal. Our Supreme Court granted certification, vacated the decision of this court, and remanded the case to this court with direction to reconsider in light of its recent decision in Carpenter v. Daar, 346 Conn. 80, 287 A.3d 1027 (2023).Gervais v. JACC Center of Danielson, LLC, supra, 346 Conn. 910.Reconsidering this appeal in light of Carpenter, we now conclude that the trial court improperly concluded that it lacked authority to permit the plaintiffs to amend the opinion letter in response to the defendants' motion to dismiss. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.")