SC20437 - State v. Johnson (“On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the admission of
the testimony of a forensic biologist and a DNA analyst violated his rights
under the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment to the United States
constitution, (2) the state violated his due process rights by failing to
correct the false or substantially misleading testimony of its witnesses, and
(3) the use of the term ‘victim’ by the prosecutor and some of the state’s witnesses
during the trial prejudiced him. We conclude that the defendant’s claims fail
and, accordingly, affirm the judgment.”)