SC20447 - State v. Graham (“On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court
erred in admitting the statement of an accomplice that inculpated the defendant,
in violation of § 8-6 (4) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence and the
defendant’s sixth amendment right to confrontation, (2) the prosecutor
committed impropriety by presenting a generic tailoring argument during closing
argument, which violated the defendant’s confrontation rights under our state
constitution, and (3) the prosecutor committed impropriety by eliciting certain
information contained in two witnesses’ cooperation agreements and by presenting
closing argument related to those materials. We affirm the judgment of
conviction.”)