SC20554 - State v. Freeman (“The sole issue on appeal is whether the prosecution of the
defendant was time barred by the five year statute of limitations set forth in
General Statutes (Rev. to 2017) § 54-193 (b)1 on the ground that the state
failed to establish that the warrant for the defendant’s arrest was executed
without unreasonable delay. See State v. Swebilius, 325 Conn. 793, 802,
159 A.3d 1099 (2017); State v. Crawford, 202 Conn. 443, 451, 521 A.2d
1034 (1987). We conclude that the state failed to produce sufficient evidence
to establish that the arrest warrant was executed with due diligence, and,
accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.”)