SC20556 - Dorfman v. Smith ("This appeal requires that we
examine the scope of the litigation privilege, which provides absolute immunity
from suit, in relation to alleged misconduct by an insurance company. The
plaintiff, Tamara Dorfman, appeals from that part of the trial court's judgment
dismissing her claims against the defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
Company for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing,
negligent infliction of emotional distress, and violation of the Connecticut
Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA); General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.; based
on a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Insurance Practices Act (CUIPA),
General Statutes § 38a-815 et seq. The trial court dismissed these claims on
the ground that the litigation privilege deprived the court of subject matter
jurisdiction over these claims. The plaintiff argues that, because these claims
were the functional equivalent of claims for vexatious litigation, the
litigation privilege did not apply. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the
judgment of the trial court.")
SC20556 Concurrence & Dissent - Dorfman v. Smith
AC43956 - Pizzoferrato v. Community Renewal Team, Inc. ("The plaintiff, Gail Pizzoferrato, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion to open and vacate the judgment of the court rendered in favor of the defendant, Community Renewal Team, Inc., in accordance with a decision of an arbitrator that resulted from court-annexed arbitration.On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly denied her motion because the language of both General Statutes § 52-549z and Practice Book § 23-66 require that a decision of an arbitrator be sent to the parties both electronically and by mail before it can become a judgment of the court. Because notice of the arbitrator's decision was never sent to the parties or their counsel by mail in the present case, the plaintiff argues that the judgment of the court, rendered on the basis of the arbitrator's decision, should be vacated. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the court.")