AC46040 - Freccia v. Freccia ("In this opinion, we resolve claims raised in three separate but related appeals, Docket Nos. AC 46037, AC 46038, and AC 46040. In the summary process action underlying AC 46037, the plaintiff, Theresa K. Freccia, in her capacity as the executor of the estate of Frank J. Freccia, Jr. (decedent), brought a summary process action against the defendants, Guin Freccia and David D'Andrea, seeking to obtain a judgment of possession with respect to real property located at 95 Bryam Road in Greenwich. The court rendered a judgment of possession in favor of the plaintiff in that action. On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the plaintiff lacked the power to commence the underlying summary process action, (2) the court improperly failed to conclude that they had a present right to remain in the subject property or that equitable considerations precluded the plaintiff from obtaining a judgment in her favor, and (3) the court prejudiced the defendants by consolidating five related summary process actions for trial.
In AC 46038, the plaintiff, Theresa K. Freccia, in her individual capacity, brought a summary process action against the defendants, Frank J. Freccia III, Tammie Freccia, Locksley Freccia, and D'Artagnan Freccia, seeking to obtain a judgment of possession with respect to real property located at '40 Locust Street, Building 2 and Garage' in Greenwich. In that action, the court rendered a judgment of possession in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the notice to quit served on them was invalid, (2) the court improperly failed to conclude that equitable considerations precluded the plaintiff from obtaining judgment in her favor, and (3) the court prejudiced the defendants by consolidating five related summary process actions for trial.
In AC 46040, the plaintiff, Theresa K. Freccia, in her capacity as executor of the estate of the decedent, brought a summary process action against the defendant, Frank J. Freccia III, doing business as Freccia Brothers Auto Sales, seeking to obtain a judgment of possession with respect to real property located at 246-248 West Putnam Avenue in Greenwich. In that action, the court rendered a judgment of possession in favor of the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the plaintiff lacked standing to commence the action, (2) the court improperly failed to conclude that he had a present right to remain in the subject property or that equitable considerations precluded the plaintiff from obtaining a judgment in her favor, and (3) the court prejudiced the defendant by consolidating five related summary process actions for trial.
We affirm the judgments of the court.")