|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Connecticut Bar Examining
Committee Regulations of the Connecticut Bar Examining Committee
|
|
||||
|
Art. I-1. MEETINGS. The committee shall hold regular meetings to determine and announce the results of the bar examinations. Special meetings may be held upon reasonable notice at such time and place to be fixed by the chairperson. In the absence of the chairperson or in the event of his or her inability to act, the time and place of any meeting may be set by the director or by any three members. Art. I-2. OFFICERS. The officers shall be a chairperson, a vice-chairperson, a secretary and a treasurer. They shall be elected at the first regular meeting in the calendar year and shall hold office for three years and until their successors shall be elected. No person shall serve as an officer for more than twelve years. Each officer shall perform the duties customarily incident to the office. Art. I-3. EXAMINATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE. There may be an examinations subcommittee for each examination, to be appointed by the chairperson, who shall have the duty, power and authority to provide for the examination of candidates and superintend the examination. Art. I-4. SUBCOMMITTEE ON NON-STANDARD TESTING.
Art. I-5. OTHER SUBCOMMITTEES. The chairperson may appoint from time to time such other subcommittees as he or she may deem desirable and, subject to the action of the committee, assign their duties and functions. ARTICLE II - Law Study Art. II-1. Approved law schools shall be the following:
Art. II-2. All applicants must receive a Juris Doctor or equivalent law degree from an approved law school not less than seven (7) days prior to the date of the examination for which the applicant has filed his or her application and proof of receipt of that degree must be received in the administrative office not less than seven (7) days prior to said examination. Art. II-3. An applicant who has studied in a foreign country may qualify to apply for admission by submitting to the committee satisfactory proof of the legal education required by all subsections of this article.
ARTICLE III - Admission by Examination and Admission by Transfer of a Uniform Bar Examination Score
Art. III-1.
Art. III-2. Incidental to an application for admission to the bar by examination or an application for admission by UBE score transfer, each applicant shall be required to file the following supporting documents as appropriate:
Art. III-3. An applicant who withdraws his or her application to take the bar examination at least thirty (30) days prior to the examination shall be entitled to a fee credit of seventy-five percent of the application fee paid by the applicant. Withdrawals for medical reasons accompanied by a doctor's certificate shall be entitled to a fee credit of seventy-five percent of the application fee paid by the applicant if received within ten (10) days after the examination. In extraordinary circumstances, the chairperson, or the chairperson’s designee, shall have the discretion to grant a credit of up to one hundred percent. In order to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances, the applicant must present evidence of exigent circumstances, such as serious illness or death in the family. All such requests related to exigent circumstances for a fee credit must be in writing and accompanied by appropriate supporting documentation, and must be received by the director within thirty days after the examination. Any fee credits to which a withdrawing applicant may be entitled must be applied toward either of the next two succeeding examinations. All withdrawals must be in writing, addressed to the director and are effective on the date received by the director. Art. III-4. The director shall give notice by publication on the committee’s website and in the Connecticut Law Journal of the names of the applicants for the examination and for admission by UBE score transfer. Any written objection received by the committee shall become part of the applicant’s file. Art. III-5. The director shall retain the applications in accordance with the records retention schedule of the Judicial Branch. Art. III-6.
ARTICLE IV - Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination Art. IV-1.
Art. IV-2. In lieu of the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination an applicant may, prior to being recommended for admission to the bar, submit evidence of satisfactory completion of a course in professional responsibility/legal ethics offered by a law school approved by the bar examining committee as part of its regular curriculum. To be acceptable, the course must be completed with a grade of either "C" or "Pass" within four years before or within one year after the date the applicant files his or her application for admission to the Connecticut bar. Art. IV-3. In lieu of the requirements set forth in Articles IV-1(C) and IV-2, an applicant for admission without examination who is a full-time faculty member or full-time clinical fellow at an accredited Connecticut law school may, prior to being recommended for admission to the bar, submit evidence of a scaled score of eighty (80) on the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination or a grade of either “C” or “Pass” in a course in professional responsibility/legal ethics offered by a law school approved by the bar examining committee as part of its regular curriculum. ARTICLE V - Examinations Art. V-1. The committee shall hold sessions semi-annually for the examination in law of applicants for admission to the bar. The examination shall be held at such place or places within the State of Connecticut as the committee may designate, one to be held the last consecutive Tuesday and Wednesday of February and one to be held the last consecutive Tuesday and Wednesday of July, in each year. Such examination shall last two days, with two sessions each day. Art. V-2. The examinations shall be in writing. The committee may allow an applicant to utilize a portable electronic device capable of operating the designated software to answer performance tests and essay questions provided that the applicant follows the procedure set forth by the committee for electing such option. Art. V-3. An applicant may be examined at the examination next preceding his or her eighteenth birthday. If successful and otherwise qualified, he or she shall be admitted to the bar only upon attaining the age of eighteen (18). Art. V-4. The examination shall be the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE), prepared by the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) and comprised of two (2) Multistate Performance Test (MPT) items, six (6) Multistate Essay Examination (MEE) questions, and the Multistate Bar Examination (MBE). Applicants may be tested on any subject matter listed by the NCBE as areas of law to be tested on the UBE. Art. V-5. Raw scores earned on the MPT and MEE portions of the examination are combined and scaled to the MBE to calculate scaled written scores. The written scaled scores and the MBE scaled scores shall be combined to determine UBE total scores, with the MPT weighted 20%, the MEE weighted 30%, and the MBE weighted 50%. Scaled scores shall be used to assure that the standard used to measure competence is not affected by the difficulty of the particular test or the ability of the applicants sitting for a particular examination. A total UBE score of two hundred sixty-six (266) shall be the minimum passing score. An applicant’s scaled MBE score shall be expressed to one decimal place. An applicant’s total UBE score shall be expressed to the nearest whole number. Art. V-6. All applicants taking the bar examination in Connecticut must sit for the MPT, MEE, and the MBE in Connecticut during the same administration of the examination and will receive a UBE score.
(A) An applicant taking the bar examination in Connecticut may request certification of a UBE score earned in Connecticut to another jurisdiction. An applicant requesting certification of a UBE score earned in Connecticut to another jurisdiction must submit such request to the NCBE.
(A) In order for the examination to be graded, the applicant must attend both the MPT and MEE sessions at the designated location in Connecticut and both sessions of the MBE in Connecticut. Any applicant who does not attend all four (4) sessions of the examination will be deemed withdrawn from the examination and will not receive examination results.
Art. V-8. The committee shall meet at such time and place as may be fixed by the chairperson to determine the results of the examination and announce the names of the applicants recommended for admission to the bar. The director shall certify the names of the applicants who are recommended for admission to the bar and the Office of the Chief Court Administrator shall notify the clerks of the superior court for each Judicial District and the press.
Art. V-9. The director shall notify each applicant of his or her results on the examination. Notification to an applicant who fails to pass the examination shall include a statement of the applicant's scores on the examination and such other examination information as the committee shall from time to time determine.
ARTICLE
VI
-
Guidelines for Assessment of Character and Fitness
Art. VI-1A. PURPOSE. The purpose of character and fitness screening before admission to the bar is the protection of the public and the system of justice. The public interest requires that the public be secure in its expectation that those who are admitted to the bar are, at the time of admission, worthy of the trust and confidence clients may reasonably place in their attorneys.
Art. VI-1B. SUBCOMMITTEE. There shall be a character and fitness subcommittee, appointed by the chairperson, which shall have the power to act for the committee as set forth below. The subcommittee shall have the duty, power and authority to order independent medical evaluations, conduct interviews, and approve conditional admission. The subcommittee shall report to the full committee regarding decisions made with respect to independent medical evaluations and conditional admission. The subcommittee shall also make recommendations to the full committee for formal hearings.
Art. VI-2. STANDARD
OF CHARACTER AND FITNESS. A lawyer should be one whose record of conduct justifies the trust of clients, adversaries, courts and others with respect to professional duties owed to them. A record manifesting a significant deficiency in the honesty, trustworthiness, diligence or reliability of an applicant may constitute a basis for denial of admission. Conduct that is merely socially unacceptable or the physical disability of the applicant is not relevant to character and fitness for law practice and will not be considered.
Art. VI-3. BURDEN
OF PROOF. The applicant bears the burden of proving his or her good moral character and fitness to practice law by clear and convincing evidence.
Art. VI-4. GOOD
MORAL CHARACTER AND FITNESS TO PRACTICE LAW. The concept of “good moral character and fitness to practice law” necessarily reflects the mores of the community as well as an estimate of the individual. The determination of present good moral character and fitness is made at the time of admission. In considering good moral character and fitness the committee will attempt to view the applicant as a whole person and take into account the applicant's entire life history rather than limit its view to isolated events in his or her life. The committee's inquiry into an applicant's character and fitness emphasizes honesty, fairness and respect for the rights of others and for the law in general. There are no specific incidents, transgressions or misconduct which will result in disqualification. However, certain conduct indicates a lack of good moral character and/or fitness to practice law (See Article VI-11 below).
Art. VI-5.
PROCEDURES.
(A) The applicant shall be given the opportunity to demonstrate present good moral character and fitness to practice law despite particular past conduct.
(B) When the committee has information weighing against a determination of good moral character and fitness to practice law:
(1) The applicant shall be notified of the information, and
(2) The applicant shall be provided the opportunity to submit such material as the applicant deems
appropriate.
(C) When an applicant's past conduct raises a question as to his or her character and fitness, the
committee will take into consideration the following:
(1) The number of incident(s) (offenses); i.e. whether single, sporadic or repeated;
(2) The seriousness of the incident(s) (offenses) and the degree of moral turpitude involved;
(3) The time of commission; e.g. whether recent or remote past;
(4) The age of the applicant at the time of the incident(s) (offenses);
(5) Any mitigating circumstances;
(6) The opinion of others about the applicant's moral character and fitness;
(7) Evidence of rehabilitation;
(8) Activities, jobs and civil service;
(9) Any other pertinent information; e.g. degree of remorse.
(D) If the applicant establishes present good moral character and fitness to practice law despite
past conduct, the committee will certify the applicant.
(E)
(1) If the character and fitness subcommittee believes there are matters which may indicate a lack of good moral character and/or fitness to practice law, a formal hearing may be scheduled. In determining whether a formal hearing on character and fitness is necessary, the subcommittee, or any member thereof, may elect to conduct an interview with the applicant, who may be represented by counsel. (3) If the committee determines that a formal hearing is necessary it shall prepare written specifications which shall be sent to the applicant by certified mail. The specifications shall provide the date, time and location of the hearing and shall state in detail the matters to be inquired into and the facts, which, if proved, would form the basis of the committee's determination of lack of good moral character and/or fitness. The specifications shall advise the applicant that the hearing shall be recorded and that he or she may be represented by counsel. However, an applicant may request a waiver of a formal hearing if the applicant is in agreement with the terms of the committee’s recommendation of admission with conditions as provided in Practice Book Sections 2-9 and 2-11. (4) The formal hearing shall be conducted before a panel of the committee consisting of at least three (3) members appointed by the chairperson which shall have the power to act for the committee. Following the conclusion of the formal hearing, the applicant shall be permitted to withdraw his or her application until an oral or written decision is rendered by the panel. The panel shall make its findings of fact and decision for or against the admission of the applicant. The applicant shall be notified of the findings of fact and decision. If the hearing is not completed within six (6) months of its commencement through no fault of the committee, the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn by the applicant. Said six (6) month period may be extended by the committee upon good and sufficient cause shown by the applicant. A request for an extension must be filed by the applicant not less than thirty (30) days before the expiration of the six month period. (5) Any applicant who is aggrieved by the panel’s decision may, within sixty (60) days after receipt of notice of the panel’s written decision, file with the administrative office a petition for reconsideration. The petition must contain new and additional material which the panel has not previously considered. Only one such petition for reconsideration may be filed. Within sixty (60) days of receipt of the petition for reconsideration, the committee shall make its findings of fact and recommendation for or against the admission of the applicant. The applicant shall be notified of the findings of fact and recommendation. Art. VI-6. CONTINUING CRIMINAL ACTIONS. Factors such as pending incarceration, probation, the restrictions of parole still in effect or unfulfilled sentences, while not determinative, will generally be considered to indicate that the rehabilitation process has not been completed. Art. VI-7. CONDUCT IN VIOLATION OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. Engaging in any conduct which would have subjected the applicant to discipline if he or she had already been a member of the bar will weigh strongly against a determination of good moral character and/or fitness. Similarly, lack of good standing in a jurisdiction where the applicant is (or was) admitted to the bar is indicative of a lack of good moral character and/or fitness. Art. VI-8. CANDOR IN THE ADMISSION PROCESS. Lack of candor in responding to questions posed on the application for admission to the bar in Connecticut (or elsewhere) or otherwise posed by the committee or its staff may be independent grounds for a finding of lack of good moral character and/or fitness notwithstanding the fact that the underlying information would not, standing alone, have been grounds for such a finding. The committee expects that all applicants will provide a complete and candid response to its inquiries, whether on the application or as part of a subsequent inquiry. Art. VI-9. PROTOCOL FOR INQUIRY INTO HEALTH DIAGNOSIS OR DRUG OR ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE. (A) Basis for Inquiry into Health Diagnosis or Drug or Alcohol Dependence. Any inquiry about a health diagnosis, drug or alcohol dependence, or treatment for either can occur only if it appears that the applicant has engaged in conduct that calls into question the person’s good moral character and/or fitness to practice law and (1) the health diagnosis, drug or alcohol dependence, or treatment information was disclosed voluntarily to explain the conduct or as a voluntary response to any question on the application or follow-up inquiry by the committee or (2) the committee learns from a third-party source that the health diagnosis, drug or alcohol dependence, or treatment was raised as an explanation for the conduct.
(B) Scope of Inquiry into Health Diagnosis or Drug or Alcohol Dependence. When a basis for an inquiry by the committee has been established, any such inquiry must be narrowly, reasonably, and individually tailored and adhere to the following:
(1) The first inquiry will be to request statements from the applicant;
(2) Following completion of the above inquiry, additional statements may be requested from treatment providers if reasonably deemed necessary by the committee.
The statements of the treatment providers shall be accorded appropriate weight; and
(3) In those cases in which the statements from the applicant and treatment providers do not resolve reasonable concerns about the applicant’s good moral character
and/or fitness to practice law, the committee may seek medical or treatment records by way of narrowly tailored requests in preparation for an Independent Medical
Evaluation.
(C) Any testimony or records from medical or other treatment providers may be admitted into evidence at a formal hearing and transmitted with the record on
review to the court. Records and testimony regarding the applicant’s fitness shall otherwise be kept confidential in all respects.
Art. VI-10.
APPLICATION REVIEW. The committee establishes the following policies regarding review and approval of applications for admission:
(A) Staff Review and Approval: Clear record; minor traffic violations (no felonies or misdemeanors);
minor credit issues (no bankruptcy, judgment defaults or large loans in collection); honorable discharge from military; in good standing in each jurisdiction
where admitted;
(B) Committee review: All other cases.
Art. VI-11. CONDUCT
THAT CREATES A PRESUMPTION OF LACK OF GOOD MORAL CHARACTER AND/OR
FITNESS TO PRACTICE LAW. The following conduct creates a presumption of and may result, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, in a finding of
lack of good moral character and/or fitness to practice law:
(A) Conviction of a felony.
(B) Course of conduct evidencing disregard for the law and the rights of others.
(C) Fraudulent conduct, which shall include, but not be limited to plagiarism and other forms of academic
misconduct.
(D) False, misleading or incomplete disclosure on application for admission to the bar in Connecticut or elsewhere.
(E) Significant financial problems evidencing fiscal mismanagement.
(F) Suspension, disbarment, or resignation pending disciplinary proceedings in another jurisdiction.
(G) Revocation or suspension of another license or governmental authorization to conduct a profession, trade
or business.
(H) Substance abuse not under control.
Art. VI-12.
REAPPLICATION AFTER DENIAL.
(A) An applicant who is denied admission to the bar for lack of good moral character and/or fitness shall not be permitted to reapply within two (2) years of denial; the denial may specify a longer period of time. An applicant so denied shall be required to either retake and pass the bar examination or apply for admission on motion or by UBE score transfer if qualified. (B) An applicant who is denied certification as an Authorized House Counsel or Foreign Legal Consultant for lack of good moral character and/or fitness shall not be permitted to reapply within one (1) year of denial; the denial may specify a longer period of time. An applicant so denied shall be required to either apply for Authorized House Counsel or Foreign Legal Consultant status, or take and pass the bar examination or apply for admission on motion or by UBE score transfer if qualified.
Art. VI-13. REPEALED.
Art. VI-14. CHEATING AND OTHER DISHONEST CONDUCT.
(A) If it shall appear to the committee that there is credible evidence which would establish that an applicant has:
(1) either by omission or commission falsified the application or proofs required for admission to the bar examination or misrepresented the applicant’s eligibility to sit for the bar examination;
(2) either by omission or commission falsified the proofs required for admission to practice with or without examination or upon UBE score transfer or for certification as an Authorized House Counsel or a Foreign Legal Consultant;
(3) either by omission or commission falsified documentation submitted in support of a request for test accommodations under Article I-4 or secured such documentation under false pretenses;
(4) brought unauthorized items or materials into the examination room or otherwise violated the committee’s examination security policy;
(5) broken the seal on the question book, opened the question booklet, or reviewed the questions in the question book prior to the announcement that the examination has begun, or otherwise violated any of the oral or written instructions given in connection with the administration of the bar examination;
(6) possessed in any manner, reviewed and/or utilized any unauthorized notes, books, recordings, electronically retrievable data or other unauthorized materials during the bar examination, or secreted such materials for such use;
(7) written or designated any answers to questions on the bar examination prior to the announcement of the beginning of the examination session or written or designated any answers or other information on an answer sheet or booklet after the announcement of the conclusion of the session;
(8) sought, obtained or used answers or information from or given answers or information to another applicant or any other person during the bar examination;
(9) removed any examination materials or notes made during the examination from the examination room;
(10) memorized questions for the purpose of reporting and/or reported the substance of questions to any person or entity engaged in, or affiliated with any person or entity engaged in, the preparation of applicants to take the bar examination or otherwise violated the copyright protection afforded to bar examination materials;
(11) engaged in fraud, dishonesty or other misconduct in connection with an application to or the administration of the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) or to a bar examination of any other jurisdiction; or
(12) compromised or disrupted the process for admission to or administration of the bar examination; the committee shall serve written charges on such applicant by mail at the last address provided to the committee by the applicant, stating with particularity the facts upon which such charges are based. The applicant’s examination results shall be withheld pending the determination of the charges by the committee.
(B) The applicant, no later than thirty (30) days after the service of charges shall cause to be delivered to the administrative office an answer, signed under oath, to such charges. Such answer shall identify with specificity the charges disputed by the applicant, who shall set forth any evidence which can be adduced by the applicant in contradiction of such charges. The applicant may include in such written answer a request that the committee hold a hearing.
(C) In the event such applicant does not submit an answer signed under oath as provided in Subsection (B), the committee shall deem the facts set forth in the written charges to be true.
(D) In the event such applicant does not request a hearing, and the committee does not on its own motion determine to conduct a hearing, the committee shall make a determination based on the evidence submitted. For all matters presented to the committee, the rules of evidence shall be as in other administrative proceedings as set forth in the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act. The committee shall have the burden of proof by the preponderance of the evidence.
(E) If the applicant shall request a hearing, or if the committee, on its own motion, determines to conduct a hearing, the committee shall set a date for a hearing before a panel of the committee consisting of at least three (3) members appointed by the chairperson which shall have the power to act for the committee. Reasonable notice of the hearing shall be provided to the applicant.
(F) If the applicant shall be found guilty by reason of:
(1) applicant’s admission that such charges are true, in whole or in part; or
(2) applicant’s default in answering the written charges, in whole or in part; or
(3) determination of the committee, after a hearing, or where no hearing was conducted, after the committee’s review of the evidence submitted, such determination shall be set forth in the committee’s written decision and one or more of the following penalties, and any other penalty which the committee may deem appropriate, may be imposed:
(a) nullification of the examination taken or the application made by such applicant;
(b) disqualification of the applicant from taking the Connecticut Bar Examination or applying for admission on motion or by UBE score transfer or for certification as an Authorized House Counsel or a Foreign Legal Consultant for a period of five (5) years from the date of such admission or determination, unless the committee articulates reasons for a lesser period of time;
(c) invalidation or striking of one or more answers of the examination taken by such applicant, or the reduction of applicant’s final score by one or more points; and/or
(d) transmission of a written report of the matter to the bar admission authority and/or disciplinary authority in every jurisdiction of the United States and, where applicable, to any foreign jurisdiction deemed appropriate by the committee.
(G) The committee shall notify the applicant of its decision in writing as soon as practicable.
ARTICLE
VII
-
Admission on Motion of Attorneys of Other States
Art. VII-1. The application for admission on motion under Practice Book § 2-13 shall be filed with the administrative office.
Art. VII-2.
Official transcripts of undergraduate and legal education sufficient to satisfy the committee that the applicant's educational qualifications meet the requirements of Practice Book § 2-13 shall be submitted directly to the committee from the school.
Art. VII-3. Applicants for admission on motion shall submit satisfactory proof of compliance with the professional responsibility requirement sufficient to satisfy Article IV of these regulations and Practice Book § 2-13.
Art. VII-4. There shall be a subcommittee on applications for admission to the Connecticut bar on motion, which subcommittee shall have the duty and authority to determine whether to accept, extend and/or revoke reciprocity to other jurisdictions.
Art. VII-5. The director shall give notice by publication on the committee’s website and in the Connecticut Law Journal of the names of the applicants for admission on motion. Any written objection received by the committee shall become part of the applicant’s file.
Art. VII-6.
(A) No person who has been disbarred from the practice of law in any jurisdiction, or who is a party to pending disbarment proceedings in any jurisdiction, or who has resigned from the bar pending disciplinary proceedings in any jurisdiction may apply for admission on motion to the Connecticut bar until he or she has been readmitted to practice without condition or restriction in the jurisdiction disbarring or accepting the resignation of such person or until the pending disbarment proceedings have been resolved in favor of the applicant.
Art. VIII-1.
The application for registration as authorized house counsel under Practice Book § 2-15A shall be filed with the administrative office.
Art. VIII-2.
Applicants for registration as authorized house counsel shall submit such documents necessary to satisfy the requirements of Practice Book § 2-15A.
Art. VIII-3.
(A) No person who has been disbarred from the practice of law in any jurisdiction, or who is a party to pending disbarment proceedings in any jurisdiction, or who has resigned from the bar pending disciplinary proceedings in any jurisdiction may apply for Authorized House Counsel status until he or she has been readmitted to practice without condition or restriction in the jurisdiction disbarring or accepting the resignation of such person or until the pending disbarment proceedings have been resolved in favor of the applicant.
ARTICLE
IX -
Timely Filing
Art. IX-1.
(A) Failure to file any required document in a timely manner may result in a delay in or a denial of the applicant's admission to the bar. Any application not completed within one (1) year of its filing shall be deemed to be withdrawn by the applicant. This one year period may be extended by the committee upon good cause shown by the applicant. Any request for extension must be filed by the applicant not less than thirty (30) days before the expiration of the one (1) year period.
Art. IX-2.
Any application not completed within nine (9) months of its filing must be updated by providing information requested by the committee. Failure to provide the requested information will render an application incomplete.
Art. IX-3.
If an application remains pending before the committee for character and fitness review for six (6) months from the date of the notice of such review, the applicant shall provide information requested by the committee updating the application. Failure to provide the requested information within three (3) months thereafter will render the application deemed withdrawn by the applicant. This three (3) month period may be extended by the committee upon good cause shown by the applicant. A request for extension must be submitted by the applicant not less than thirty (30) days before the expiration of the three (3) month period.
Art. IX-4.
Each applicant must diligently pursue his or her application with the committee after it has been referred for further inquiry pursuant to Article VI. Applicants must respond to inquiries and forward requested documentation to the committee within ninety (90) days of the inquiry, unless a longer deadline is set by the committee. A request for an extension of time for good cause may be submitted prior to the expiration of the ninety (90) days or other deadline set by the committee. A grant of an extension shall be for a date certain.
Art. IX-5.
In the absence of good cause shown to the contrary, failure to respond to inquiries by the committee after referral for further inquiry pursuant to Article VI or to make a timely request for an extension of time to respond to such inquiries shall result in the application being deemed withdrawn. The committee shall notify the applicant in writing at the applicant’s last known correspondence address.
Art. IX-6.
Applicants recommended for admission to the bar or for certification as authorized house counsel or to practice as a foreign legal consultant shall be certified for admission by the committee. Such certification shall expire after one hundred and eighty (180) days. If such certification expires, an applicant must update his or her application by providing information requested by the committee before he or she may be recertified for an additional one hundred and eighty (180) days.
Art. IX-7.
An applicant recommended by the committee, but not admitted to the bar within five (5) years of the date of such recommendation, shall be required to either retake and pass the bar examination or apply for admission on motion or by UBE score transfer if qualified.
ARTICLE
X - General Provisions
Art. X-1. SCHEDULE OF FEES.
(A) Application fee for admission by examination:
(B) Application fee for admission by UBE score transfer: $750
(C) Application fee for admission without examination: $1,800
(D) Application fee for registration as authorized house counsel: $1000
(E) Military Spouse Temporary Licensing:
(F) Application fee for foreign legal consultant: $500
(G) Petition for determination on foreign education: $500
(H) Copy of prior examination answers (includes questions): $35
(I) Copy of applicant's application: $15
(J) Copy of applicant’s written answers: $20
(K) Confirmation of applicant’s written scores: $10
(L) Transmittal of applicant's MBE score to another jurisdiction: $25
(M) Replacement of examination scores and information: $15
(N) Replacement of admission certificate: $20
Art. X-2. NCBE NUMBER. Each applicant must register for and obtain a properly issued NCBE Number from the National Conference of Bar Examiners before submitting an application. Art. X-3. FORMS, APPLICATIONS, AND PETITIONS. The committee may require that forms, applications, and petitions be executed under oath, under penalty of false statement, or by other means allowable by law. Connecticut Judicial Branch Website Links: Attorneys
| Case Look-up | Courts |
Directories |
Educational Resources | E-Services |
Español | FAQs |
Juror
Information | Media |
Opinions | Opportunities |
Self-Help |
Home Common Legal Words | Contact Us |
Site Map | Website Policies and
Disclaimers Copyright © 2016,
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch |
|||||