AC46939 - Michaud v. Travel Indemnity Co. (“The plaintiff, Yvonne Michaud, appeals following the trial court’s denial of the application to vacate an arbitration award she filed in her pending civil action against the defendant, Travelers Indemnity Company. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court, Buckley, J., improperly failed to vacate the arbitration award in accordance with General Statutes § 52-418 because, contrary to the conclusions of the court, the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law when she granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed with prejudice the plaintiff’s complaint of age discrimination in violation of General Statutes § 46a-60 (b) (1). Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law ‘‘by failing to consider the evidence explaining why [her] objection to the motion for summary judgment was filed late,’’ ‘‘by granting summary judgment where the defendant had not satisfied its burden in establishing its entitlement to summary judgment as to the pay raise and bonus denials,’’ and by concluding, nonetheless, that the ‘‘plaintiff could not establish [that she suffered] an adverse employment action.’’ We cannot reach the merits of the claims the plaintiff has raised on appeal, however, because the court’s denial of the application to vacate the arbitration award, in the context of this case, is not an appealable final judgment. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”)