Excerpts from LPL Case Management
Order No. 1:
I. Subject Matter
1. This case management order shall apply to all
civil matters related to lead paint litigation in the Superior Court of
the State of Connecticut with respect to the subject matter addressed in
this order. Matters not addressed shall be governed by the Rules of
Practice of the Connecticut Superior Court.
2. This case management order may be supplemented
or superseded by additional case management orders as deemed required by
the undersigned presiding judge, issued after notice and hearing.
3. Nothing contained in this order shall cause
pending cases with assigned trial dates or weeks certain to be delayed
or postponed, except as provided in VIII.2 and VIII.7.
II. "LPL" Designation
1. In all civil cases in which a claim of damages
resulting from lead paint exposure is made, the designation "LPL"
must appear as a prefix to the docket number on all filings.
2. In all declaratory judgment actions where the
underlying action involves a claim of damages resulting from lead paint
exposure, the designation "LPL" must appear as a prefix to the
docket number on all filings.
III. New Actions: Filings; Notice of Filing
1. The venue provisions of Conn. Gen. Stat. §
51-345 (formerly Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-42) apply to all civil actions
related to lead paint. Cases should bear the designation "LPL" in
a prominent place on the face sheet.
2. Notice of the filing of new actions related to
lead paint, including any declaratory judgment action, must be provided
to:
Krista Hess
Program Manager
Superior Court Operations Division
Court Operations Unit
225 Spring Street, 2nd floor
Wethersfield, CT 06109
Such notice shall contain the name of the case,
the return date, the Judicial District in which filed, and the name,
address, juris number and telephone number of counsel.
3. All civil cases related to lead paint shall
remain pending in the judicial district in which they are filed, subject
to the provisions of this case management order, any future case
management orders and further order of the Chief Court Administrator.
IV. Mandatory Limited Disclosure
1. Within 14 days of the filing of an appearance
for the defendant(s), plaintiffs shall provide the following information
to appearing counsel and/or pro se parties:
(a) A list of the prior and subsequent
residences of the minor plaintiff(s); and
(b) A list of the blood lead levels of the
minor plaintiff(s), or
(c) A list of known medical providers and
limited authorizations for the release of medical records pertaining
to blood lead levels of the minor plaintiff(s) from such providers.
2. If the limited disclosure required in IV.1 is
not provided, the defendant(s) may file a motion to compel compliance in
the original file with a copy directed to the undersigned. The
undersigned will decide any such motions to compel compliance on the
papers within 14 days of receipt.
3. In all pending civil cases in which a claim of
damages resulting from lead paint exposure has been made, disclosure
pursuant to IV.1 shall be made within 21 days of the issuance of this
order unless already provided, subject to any prior protective orders
already issued in the case.
4. If the plaintiff(s) provide limited medical
authorizations pursuant to IV.1 (c), the defense shall provide to the plaintiff(s) copies of any medical records pertaining to blood lead
levels obtained from medical providers as a result.
V. Short Calendar
1. A single unified short calendar for all lead
paint related cases ("LPL Short Calendar") will be conducted by the
undersigned on a periodic basis.
2. The following motions
may be claimed or reclaimed for the "LPL Short Calendar" according to
the procedure specified in Appendix A, incorporated within this order:
-
Motion to Dismiss - CPB § 142, 143
-
Motion to Strike - CPB § 151
-
Motion to Implead/Cite in Additional Party - CPB § 117
-
Motion for Summary Judgment - CPB § 378 et seq
-
Motion for Protective Order - CPB § 221
-
Objection to Request that Plaintiff Submit to Exam - CPB § 229
-
Sufficiency of Answer to Request for Admission and Objection to
Request for Admission - CPB § 239
5. The following motions will not be decided by
the undersigned as part of the LPL Short Calendar and should be filed
and claimed in the judicial district in which the case is pending:
-
Motions for Default
-
Motions for Extension of Time
-
Requests to Revise
-
Motion to Withdraw Appearance of Counsel
-
Motion to Substitute Appearance of Counsel
-
Motion for Continuance (unless concerns
motion pending on the LPL Short Calendar pursuant to V.2 above)
-
220D Motions
-
Motions re Depositions
-
Motion for Order for Compliance - CPB §
13-14, in cases with an assigned trial date
-
Any motion directed to discovery in cases
with an assigned trial date
-
Motion to Exempt from Dormancy
VIII. Pre Trials; Trials
1. Trial dates shall be scheduled in the Judicial
District in which the case is pending.
2. There shall be no continuances granted based
on this order in any civil case seeking damages resulting from lead
paint exposure which has a firm trial date in the Judicial District in
which it is pending. Declaratory judgment actions related to an
underlying civil case seeking damages resulting from lead paint exposure
may be continued at the discretion of the undersigned.
3. Cases may be pretried in the ordinary course
in the Judicial District in which they are pending. This order shall not
constitute a basis upon which to request a continuance of any court
scheduled pretrial in any LPL case.
4. Counsel may request the undersigned to
judicially pretry any LPL case pending in any Judicial District pursuant
to the requirements contained in Appendix B, incorporated within this
order.
5. The undersigned will consider any proposals
submitted by any interested party for pretrials by special masters for
LPL cases.
6. In all LPL cases, counsel and pro se parties
of record may request pretrial referrals pursuant to Connecticut
Practice Book § 23-67 or to court annexed ADR programs.
7. Any party in an LPL case with an assigned
trial date or week certain may request an exemption from any applicable
provision of this order in writing from the undersigned upon good cause
shown.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________
LINDA K. LAGER, PRESIDING JUDGE
FOR LEAD PAINT LITIGATION
Entered this 27th day of November, 1996 at New
Haven, Connecticut.