6.1-11 Assault in the Second Degree with a Firearm -- § 53a-60a
Revised to December 1, 2007
The defendant is charged [in count ___] with assault in the second degree with a firearm. The statute defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of assault in the second degree with a firearm when (he/she) commits assault in the second degree, and in the commission of such offense (he/she) (uses / is armed with and threatens the use of / displays or represents by (his/her) words or conduct that (he/she) possesses) a pistol, revolver, machine gun, shotgun, rifle or other firearm.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 – Committed assault
in the second degree
The first element is that the defendant committed assault in the second degree. <See instruction for underlying crime:>
§ 53a-60 (a) (1): Assault in the Second Degree, Instruction 6.1-6.
§ 53a-60 (a) (2): Assault in the Second Degree, Instruction 6.1-7.
§ 53a-60 (a) (3): Assault in the Second Degree, Instruction 6.1-8.
§ 53a-60 (a) (4): Assault in the Second Degree, Instruction 6.1-9.
§ 53a-60 (a) (5): Assault in the Second Degree, Instruction 6.1-10.
Element 2 - With a firearm
The second element is that in the commission of the assault the defendant <insert as appropriate:>1
used a firearm.
was armed with and threatened the use of a firearm.
displayed or represented by (his/her) words or conduct that (he/she) possessed a firearm. [It is not required that what the defendant represents to be a firearm be loaded or that the defendant actually have a firearm. It need only be represented by words or conduct that (he/she) is so armed.]
<Describe specific allegations regarding firearm.> "Firearm" means any sawed-off shotgun, machine gun, rifle, shotgun, pistol, revolver or other weapon, whether loaded or unloaded, from which a shot may be discharged.2 You must find that the firearm was operable at the time of the incident.3
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert the concluding summary from the instruction for the underlying crime>, and that in the commission of the assault the defendant (used / threatened the use of / displayed or represented that (he/she) had) a firearm.
If you unanimously find that the state
has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements of the crime of
assault in the second degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the
other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not
1 Carefully tailor this part of the instruction according to the nature of the conduct alleged and the type of firearm involved. See State v. Tomlin, 266 Conn. 608, 626-27 (2003) (allegation of "did shoot" only supported instructing on the first of three distinct methods of committing the offense).
"No person shall be found guilty of
assault in the second degree and assault in the second degree with a firearm
upon the same transaction but such person may be charged and prosecuted for both
such offenses upon the same information." General Statutes § 53a-60a (a).