|
4.4-9
Termination of
Agent=s
Actual Authority
New
March 5, 2010
The
defendant claims that the agency relationship between (him/her/it) and <name
of agent> was terminated before <name of agent> entered into the <specify
transaction> which is the basis of the plaintiff=s
claim in this case. The defendant has the burden of proving that the agency
relationship between (him/her/it) and <name of agent> had been
terminated.
The
defendant claims that the agency relationship was terminated <select one or
more:>
- when the time specified in the agency agreement
expired.
- when the purpose of the agency had been accomplished.
- when the parties agreed to termination.
- when the agency had been revoked by the principal.
- when the agency had been renounced by the agent.
- by operation of law.
If you
find that the agency had been terminated by the defendant and that the plaintiff
had notice of that termination, prior to <specify transaction> which is
the basis of the plaintiff=s
claim, then you must find that the defendant is not liable to the plaintiff for
<specify>.
Authority
3 Am. Jur.
2d, Agency
''
35, 37, 40, 41, 45, 52-59, 342 (2002).
|
